↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1012649028772
Authors

B. Amon, Th. Amon, J. Boxberger, Ch. Alt

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 112 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 29%
Engineering 15 12%
Unspecified 9 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Other 13 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#3,547,310
of 12,342,397 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#68
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,867
of 259,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them