“Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?” in #Scientometrics 2014 with @ProfJHartley https://t.co/9tOenE8tbM [https://t.co/X0jqA8sc81] #retroself #gender #acwri https://t.co/98OPLGyflr
@jaheppler @scott_bot And also this research on tables & figures might be remotely related https://t.co/Ii5OLh2B9n https://t.co/sqTpknFRVe https://t.co/Of5MrJQxHl
@jevinwest Your Viziometrics announcement reminded me about https://t.co/pbvTxqOTuF & https://t.co/0zsWCzqhC7 Did you find similar results?
Great paper title: Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications? http://t.co/U5KUUIF8I9 HT @gentraso
Are there gender differences in using tools for what I call "cognition in representation"? http://t.co/mNOAUHi33i http://t.co/KtpPEL9g6M
Gender gap in use of QM? No bias in use tables v graphs in socsci but only examined articles with them. http://t.co/UD89OFxJja #springerlink
Great paper title: Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications? http://t.co/U5KUUIF8I9 HT @gentraso
'in the sciences, men used 26% more graphs and figures than women' In the social sciences, no difference. http://t.co/DfFtLs5OdG
'in the sciences, men used 26% more graphs and figures than women' In the social sciences, no difference. http://t.co/DfFtLs5OdG
"Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in acad publications?" in #Scientometrics w/ @ProfJHartley http://t.co/Ii5OLhkc0V