↓ Skip to main content

Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?
Published in
Scientometrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1096-3
Authors

James Hartley, Guillaume Cabanac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Librarian 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 24%
Computer Science 6 24%
Engineering 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,708,037
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,176
of 2,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,970
of 198,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#21
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.