↓ Skip to main content

Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?
Published in
Scientometrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1096-3
Authors

James Hartley, Guillaume Cabanac

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Librarian 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 28%
Social Sciences 4 22%
Engineering 3 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,742,205
of 13,755,046 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#725
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,199
of 155,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.