↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth
Published in
Oecologia, April 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004420050459
Authors

Theodore H. Fleming, J. Nathaniel Holland

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 5%
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Spain 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 117 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Master 20 14%
Professor 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 81%
Environmental Science 12 8%
Unspecified 8 5%
Chemistry 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,880,409
of 11,130,136 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#861
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,463
of 259,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#27
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,130,136 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.