| Title |
The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, April 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004420050459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore H. Fleming, J. Nathaniel Holland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 4% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 148 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 20% |
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,715
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,152
of 32,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.