↓ Skip to main content

Place and Child Health: The Interaction of Population Density and Sanitation in Developing Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Place and Child Health: The Interaction of Population Density and Sanitation in Developing Countries
Published in
Demography, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13524-016-0538-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Payal Hathi, Sabrina Haque, Lovey Pant, Diane Coffey, Dean Spears

Abstract

A long literature in demography has debated the importance of place for health, especially children's health. In this study, we assess whether the importance of dense settlement for infant mortality and child height is moderated by exposure to local sanitation behavior. Is open defecation (i.e., without a toilet or latrine) worse for infant mortality and child height where population density is greater? Is poor sanitation is an important mechanism by which population density influences child health outcomes? We present two complementary analyses using newly assembled data sets, which represent two points in a trade-off between external and internal validity. First, we concentrate on external validity by studying infant mortality and child height in a large, international child-level data set of 172 Demographic and Health Surveys, matched to census population density data for 1,800 subnational regions. Second, we concentrate on internal validity by studying child height in Bangladeshi districts, using a new data set constructed with GIS techniques that allows us to control for fixed effects at a high level of geographic resolution. We find a statistically robust and quantitatively comparable interaction between sanitation and population density with both approaches: open defecation externalities are more important for child health outcomes where people live more closely together.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 62 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 18%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 71 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,083,770
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#565
of 1,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,543
of 422,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.