Title |
Tropical cyclones in the Mozambique Channel: January–March 2012
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-1691-0 |
Authors |
Hector Chikoore, Jan H. Vermeulen, Mark R. Jury |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,289,963
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#89
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,899
of 262,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.