| Title |
Advances in industrial microbiome based on microbial consortium for biorefinery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40643-017-0141-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Li Jiang, Jin-Jie Zhou, Chun-Shan Quan, Zhi-Long Xiu |
| Abstract |
One of the important targets of industrial biotechnology is using cheap biomass resources. The traditional strategy is microbial fermentations with single strain. However, cheap biomass normally contains so complex compositions and impurities that it is very difficult for single microorganism to utilize availably. In order to completely utilize the substrates and produce multiple products in one process, industrial microbiome based on microbial consortium draws more and more attention. In this review, we first briefly described some examples of existing industrial bioprocesses involving microbial consortia. Comparison of 1,3-propanediol production by mixed and pure cultures were then introduced, and interaction relationships between cells in microbial consortium were summarized. Finally, the outlook on how to design and apply microbial consortium in the future was also proposed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,828,495
of 25,078,088 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#32
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,068
of 431,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,078,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.