↓ Skip to main content

Inguinal neuritis is common in primary inguinal hernia

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Inguinal neuritis is common in primary inguinal hernia
Published in
Hernia, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10029-011-0807-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. C. Wright, E. Sanders

Abstract

Establishing the existence of inguinal neuritis, and defining patterns of nerve involvement in primary inguinal hernia repair.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 90%
Unspecified 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#11,155,216
of 12,539,406 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#387
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,140
of 152,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,539,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.