@anniesperson I'm curious who it says it's from. You might be in an experiment (or the party is learning from the experimental literature). https://t.co/fB78lpA1fc
@austers @IvetaKazoka @e_vanags @Mkaprans Bet vispār viens no efektīvākajiem veidiem varētu būt līdzīgi kā ASV, kur ir pieejams balsojušo saraksts. Vēstules, kas informēja par iepriekšējo personas aktivitāti vēlēšanās, efektīvi paaugstināja līdzdalību: htt
@SpeaksAngie This actually surprised me, as shame is quite an unappealing method of motivation. Unappealing but perhaps effective? https://t.co/T1Lq25gK0V
RT @openargs: Social science research demonstrating that shame is more effective than praise in motivating people to vote. H/T @FiveThirty…
RT @openargs: Social science research demonstrating that shame is more effective than praise in motivating people to vote. H/T @FiveThirty…
Social science research demonstrating that shame is more effective than praise in motivating people to vote. H/T @FiveThirtyEight https://t.co/bJ9cdNWBaS
But the charge that the experiment influenced the election is bizarre. Most voting experiments do this: http://t.co/va1LVZkbhD (2/2)
Voting rate rises when people receive mailings that show whether they voted in previous elections. Interesting! http://t.co/M1GJBYhjCh #fb