↓ Skip to main content

The burden of choice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ reactions to ethical challenges in humanitarian crises

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The burden of choice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ reactions to ethical challenges in humanitarian crises
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41018-017-0019-y
Authors

Sarah Gotowiec, Elizabeth Cantor-Graae

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,737,993
of 11,807,722 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#28
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,043
of 328,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,807,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.