↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Global Adoption of One Health Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Assessing Global Adoption of One Health Approaches
Published in
EcoHealth, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10393-013-0851-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Hueston, Jessica Appert, Terry Denny, Lonnie King, Jamie Umber, Linda Valeri

Abstract

Transdisciplinary One Health (OH) approaches have been rediscovered as a promising tactic for addressing complex health risks at the human-animal-ecosystem interface. However, there is little evidence of widespread adoption of OH approaches as the new operating normal for addressing these complex health issues. We have used a transformational change model as an evaluation tool and part of an overall assessment of the global adoption of OH approaches. This assessment establishes a point of reference for measuring progress toward OH approaches being the new operating normal. Global adoption of OH approaches will require more strategic efforts to build the case (value proposition), recruiting a broader pool of One Health champions, solidifying partnerships and unifying OH efforts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 12%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#10,050,221
of 12,562,772 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#415
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,784
of 150,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,562,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.