↓ Skip to main content

Thermal desorption of HCH

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 236)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Thermal desorption of HCH
Published in
Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10973-015-4810-y
Authors

M. M. Araújo, S. G. Ignatius, A. O. Oliveira, S. S. Oliveira, F. L. Fertonani, I. A. Paste

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,370,577
of 8,976,941 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry
#12
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,604
of 309,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,976,941 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.