↓ Skip to main content

Looking beyond scores: validating a CEFR-based university speaking assessment in Mainland China

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Looking beyond scores: validating a CEFR-based university speaking assessment in Mainland China
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40468-017-0034-3
Authors

Li Liu, Guodong Jia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 16 36%
Social Sciences 8 18%
Arts and Humanities 6 14%
Materials Science 1 2%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,875,029
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#122
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,360
of 420,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.