↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of surface area concentration of workplace incidental nanoparticles based on number and mass concentrations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of surface area concentration of workplace incidental nanoparticles based on number and mass concentrations
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11051-011-0469-x
Authors

J. Y. Park, G. Ramachandran, P. C. Raynor, S. W. Kim

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 24%
Environmental Science 3 18%
Engineering 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Chemistry 2 12%
Other 2 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,684,450
of 7,136,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#70
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,399
of 95,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,136,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them