| Title |
Estimation of surface area concentration of workplace incidental nanoparticles based on number and mass concentrations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-011-0469-x |
| Authors |
J. Y. Park, G. Ramachandran, P. C. Raynor, S. W. Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 19% |
| Engineering | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,901
of 116,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.