↓ Skip to main content

Explanatory models of major depression and implications for help-seeking among immigrant Chinese-American women

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Explanatory models of major depression and implications for help-seeking among immigrant Chinese-American women
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00117563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Wen Ying

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 3 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 1999.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#412
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,509
of 15,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them