Title |
Effect of the conditional cash transfer program Oportunidades on vaccination coverage in older Mexican people
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-13-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez, Betty Soledad Manrique-Espinoza |
Abstract |
Immunization is one of the most effective ways of preventing illness, disability and death from infectious diseases for older people. However, worldwide immunization rates are still low, particularly for the most vulnerable groups within the elderly population. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of the Oportunidades -an incentive-based poverty alleviation program- on vaccination coverage for poor and rural older people in Mexico. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,820
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,796
of 206,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.