↓ Skip to main content

Thought experiments without possible worlds

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Thought experiments without possible worlds
Published in
Philosophical Studies, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0871-z
Authors

Daniel Dohrn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 50%
Mathematics 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,922,182
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#445
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,113
of 425,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.