↓ Skip to main content

Thought experiments without possible worlds

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Thought experiments without possible worlds
Published in
Philosophical Studies, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0871-z
Authors

Daniel Dohrn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,761,060
of 13,616,431 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#99
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,309
of 346,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,616,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.