↓ Skip to main content

A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2036-7902-5-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osman Adi, Tan Wan Chuan, Manikam Rishya

Abstract

In emergency settings, verification of endotracheal tube (ETT) location is important for critically ill patients. Ignorance of oesophageal intubation can be disastrous. Many methods are used for verification of the endotracheal tube location; none are ideal. Quantitative waveform capnography is considered the standard of care for this purpose but is not always available and is expensive. Therefore, this feasibility study is conducted to compare a cheaper alternative, bedside upper airway ultrasonography to waveform capnography, for verification of endotracheal tube location after intubation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 17%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 24 22%