↓ Skip to main content

Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review

Overview of attention for article published in Agronomy for Sustainable Development, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review
Published in
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, March 2009
DOI 10.1051/agro:2007057
Authors

E. Malézieux, Y. Crozat, C. Dupraz, M. Laurans, D. Makowski, H. Ozier-Lafontaine, B. Rapidel, S. de Tourdonnet, M. Valantin-Morison

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Unknown 14 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,323,491
of 8,838,295 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#275
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,669
of 303,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,838,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.