↓ Skip to main content

Livestock mobility and animal health policy in southern Africa: the impact of veterinary cordon fences on pastoralists

Overview of attention for article published in Pastoralism, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Livestock mobility and animal health policy in southern Africa: the impact of veterinary cordon fences on pastoralists
Published in
Pastoralism, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/2041-7136-1-14
Authors

Daniel J McGahey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 30%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pastoralism
#118
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,057
of 131,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pastoralism
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them