↓ Skip to main content

Gaining scientific recognition by position: Does editorship increase citation rates?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Gaining scientific recognition by position: Does editorship increase citation rates?
Published in
Scientometrics, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02458490
Authors

Lydia L. Lange, P. A. Frensch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Croatia 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,529,032
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,281
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,845
of 35,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.