↓ Skip to main content

cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 263)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System
Published in
Ecological Processes, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0070-z
Authors

Xianli Wang, B. Mike Wotton, Alan S. Cantin, Marc-André Parisien, Kerry Anderson, Brett Moore, Mike D. Flannigan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Engineering 8 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,992,432
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#45
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,195
of 427,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.