↓ Skip to main content

How caregivers view patient comfort and what they do to improve it: a French survey

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
How caregivers view patient comfort and what they do to improve it: a French survey
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-3-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique Lombardo, Isabelle Vinatier, Marie-Lou Baillot, Vicenta Franja, Irma Bourgeon-Ghittori, Sandrine Dray, Sylvie Jeune, Chirine Mossadegh, Jean Reignier, Bertrand Souweine, Antoine Roch, Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are exposed to many sources of discomfort. Most of these are related to the patient's condition, but ICU design or how care is organized also can contribute. The present survey was designed to describe the opinions of ICU caregivers on sources of patient discomfort and to determine how they were dealt with in practice. The architectural and organizational characteristics of ICUs also were analyzed in relation to patient comfort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Guatemala 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 25%
Engineering 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#13,539,941
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#706
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,813
of 196,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.