↓ Skip to main content

Identifying optimal tag-along station locations for improving VLBI Intensive sessions

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Identifying optimal tag-along station locations for improving VLBI Intensive sessions
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40623-017-0601-y
Authors

Niko Kareinen, Grzegorz Klopotek, Thomas Hobiger, Rüdiger Haas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,489,062
of 13,530,222 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#215
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,371
of 347,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,530,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.