↓ Skip to main content

Computed tomography in the evaluation of vascular rings and slings

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Computed tomography in the evaluation of vascular rings and slings
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13244-014-0343-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Etesami, R. Ashwath, J. Kanne, R. C. Gilkeson, P. Rajiah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 31%
Student > Postgraduate 10 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 81%
Unspecified 4 11%
Engineering 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,592,016
of 8,963,105 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#125
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,796
of 308,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,963,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.