@FChecker76 @ryangerritsen @s_guilbeault You aren’t paying attention. Removing your blinders and reading and comprehending is hard for you stubborn political tribalist. https://t.co/MEk1FeVMhP
@raynbowdec @robinmonotti @thierrybaudet no it wasn't the rebuttals got rebutted https://t.co/hY0u42urq1 https://t.co/ijt4lx7PxO
@DanMan_010101 @GiovenaleEmilio @BlockChainCaffe @fdragoni @jimmomo Dalla risposta di Cook, pubblicata subito dopo, sembra che Legates abbia (volutamente) confuso il consenso su specifici aspetti del climate change (ci sono certamente fattori di cui si con
@markusgisel @joenuc Hören Sie auf mit den Lügen. Weder haben Sie die Studie gelesen noch würden Sie sie verstehen. Und auch nicht die vielen anderen, wissenschaftsphober Troll. https://t.co/LLqsWmUfyt
@markusgisel @joenuc Wenn man keine Ahnung hat. Das Paper ist von bekannten Wissenschaftsleugnern und ist nur die Antwort auf https://t.co/FEfA5VyYPf. Sie sollten aufhören mit den Lügen. Der Konsens wurde in etlichen weiteren Studien belegt - keine Studie
@MatthewWielicki @MarcInTbilisi @SophiaKianni Hmmmm. Matt’s wrong again. I mean, c’mon. Willie Soon? Lol. Why aren’t you listed in any responses. You only meme. Why is that? https://t.co/hpgivsEqvR https://t.co/zhnfdsxjgN
@MatthewWielicki Mathew Legates et Al quoted Bedford's paper. Here is Bedford himself commenting on the misuse of his paper for the Legates Paper Please read and stop posting this meme https://t.co/4Ei6dpHsg5
@jordanbpeterson @algore @ClimateEnvoy Gosh. You forgot to cite the study that thoroughly discredits your conclusions. https://t.co/sPd7q61Qo5
@FChecker76 @redwondereroft1 @kropija @ScottAdamsSays Misleading, check the facts before blindly believing this bs. https://t.co/CTFQb2ghaf
@FChecker76 @Steve91720287 @SmallHotChilli @bbcquestiontime Legates has been shown to be misleading, and their erroneous interpretations been highlighted. Proper research would show this. https://t.co/CTFQb2ghaf
@FChecker76 @DrumpfForJail @redwondereroft1 @kropija @ScottAdamsSays I did and not only did Cook not say it in the way you think he did but he actually wrote a response letter condemning Legates article and called it a campaign to stop climate action. I ag
@FChecker76 @DrumpfForJail @redwondereroft1 @kropija @ScottAdamsSays when response letters come out dunking on them repeatedly, sending them back to the realm outside scientific consensus. https://t.co/zp0ruG5jt5
@FChecker76 @DrumpfForJail @redwondereroft1 @kropija @ScottAdamsSays Not only did Cook not say that, but Cook actually wrote a response letter to Legates Et Al saying how he disagrees with the statements and how misinformation like you are spreading is a c
@FChecker76 @kevinsinclairsk @DavidColetto But Bedford & Cook, 2013, analyzed & specified how Legates made errors. And explain how, while the "science is not settled", the remaining debates are around the details, and the questions of "how much" i
@_42________ @Curmudgeon1836 @GeraldKutney https://t.co/3Daxb2TCAP replies to Legates, Soon & Briggs 2013 https://t.co/HfzKdTehP1
@BaranskiDaniel @rodneygmz Ah, casi me olvide de vos. Acerca del paper que enlazaste, el autor al cual estaba criticando publico una respuesta explicandole a Legates en que partes era erronea la interpretación que hizo de los datos. https://t.co/sGXbdFw3Gz
@SimonMaxfield8 @KarlRobinson02 @SConwaySmith @LuckyHeronSay @BorisJohnson @COP26 Their row is old news https://t.co/YppcDBXVRU
@QuantenDoc @Jule_Chiyoko @PoterHairy @FeynmansMethod @DL4GO @Luisamneubauer Und der Hauptautor ist anscheinend genauso ein Lobbyist: https://t.co/Kbc232WC9c https://t.co/zysnNYKjbv Und hier auch die Antwort auf das Paper: https://t.co/bCcAUvAH26 Hier hab
@DawnTJ90 Sure is: " the existence of a scientific consensus—especially one as overwhelming as exists for human-induced climate change—raises the level of confidence that the overall findings of that consensus are correct." https://t.co/1X3tNaC70w
@Alienna3 @JonasNorden @thinkprogress Du behöver bli mer skeptisk till sådant... Läs exv: https://t.co/x7ygxDINHj & https://t.co/dhxNy4HJHO
@SimonMaxfield8 By your logic, this article "destroys" Legates' publication, and published by the same journal. https://t.co/1AouLNtqLM
Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change https://t.co/nzNqXjPdMF
@GalileoMovement http://t.co/DJIflDQhY0 the rebuttal in the same journal!
@BraveheartCamp @rahmstorf Braveheart Campaign, read this: http://t.co/3qw61WpuGA
@hockeyschtick1 And here is Legates, who was fired from his job, being debunked as the quack he is http://t.co/oxQJRumexF #ClimateChange
@Woodshedder You know they published a response in the same journal, right? http://t.co/mhwFYuQX29