↓ Skip to main content

NUTRITION SUPPORT PRACTICES IN CRITICALLY ILL HEAD INJURED PATIENTS: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
NUTRITION SUPPORT PRACTICES IN CRITICALLY ILL HEAD INJURED PATIENTS: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a984
Pubmed ID
Authors

L Costello, M Chapman, A Deane, K Lange, D Heyland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Sports and Recreations 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,207,357
of 21,301,913 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#288
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,507
of 391,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,301,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.