↓ Skip to main content

Livestock grazing in intermountain depressional wetlands: effects on breeding waterfowl

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands Ecology & Management, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Livestock grazing in intermountain depressional wetlands: effects on breeding waterfowl
Published in
Wetlands Ecology & Management, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11273-017-9529-z
Authors

R. B. Harrison, W. M. Jones, D. Clark, B. A. Heise, L. H. Fraser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 21%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 37%
Unspecified 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,269,287
of 11,586,569 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands Ecology & Management
#172
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,558
of 323,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands Ecology & Management
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,586,569 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.