↓ Skip to main content

Solving the clinker dilemma with hybrid output-based allocation

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Solving the clinker dilemma with hybrid output-based allocation
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1884-x
Authors

Frédéric Branger, Misato Sato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 31%
Unspecified 3 23%
Engineering 2 15%
Energy 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,735,395
of 13,629,017 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#4,126
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,083
of 346,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#41
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,629,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.