↓ Skip to main content

Classification of Near-Horizon Geometries of Extremal Black Holes

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Classification of Near-Horizon Geometries of Extremal Black Holes
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, September 2013
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2013-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hari K. Kunduri, James Lucietti

Abstract

Any spacetime containing a degenerate Killing horizon, such as an extremal black hole, possesses a well-defined notion of a near-horizon geometry. We review such near-horizon geometry solutions in a variety of dimensions and theories in a unified manner. We discuss various general results including horizon topology and near-horizon symmetry enhancement. We also discuss the status of the classification of near-horizon geometries in theories ranging from vacuum gravity to Einstein-Maxwell theory and supergravity theories. Finally, we discuss applications to the classification of extremal black holes and various related topics. Several new results are presented and open problems are highlighted throughout.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
India 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 39%
Researcher 7 21%
Unspecified 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 25 76%
Mathematics 4 12%
Unspecified 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2013.
All research outputs
#6,704,565
of 12,748,058 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#85
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,112
of 149,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,748,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them