RT @PETFanir: @DrJudyAMikovits AZT saved AIDS patients in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. HIV/AIDS denialism kills people who…
@DrJudyAMikovits AZT saved AIDS patients in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. HIV/AIDS denialism kills people who reject evidence-based medicine. https://t.co/7n8ndvAprz
@jaimej316 @TakethatCt @RealDrJaneRuby @patriotstorm17 @00 HIV causes AIDS. Hemophilia who received filtered blood could contract a pathogen small enough to eventually develop into AIDS. https://t.co/ET8LKsPwNs
PapersOfTheDay https://t.co/jceDVc4127 https://t.co/wP0Lns93rZ "Still crazy after all these years: The challenge of AIDS denialism for science" https://t.co/RifpYGAqrr "The psychology of AIDS denialism" https://t.co/za9IJeDR8W https://t.co/an0ZKB6lwW
@JanLWadeEsquire @DrJudyAMikovits Duesberg is an appeal to false authority fallacy. Credentials are irrelevant when the claims are proven wrong by scientific evidence that HIV causes AIDS. #Misinformation https://t.co/7n8ndvzRC1
PaperOfTheDay https://t.co/qOglyNUlDW https://t.co/jceDVc3tcz "“There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS" https://t.co/PCvbr5FujI https://t.co/VGiNCMGcN0
@Ojaterf94 @holisticgrenade NIH HIV/AIDs deniers study Findings as why many deny. References those who contracted seek false hope when ART does not work. Compassion towards deniers. Please. 🌿 https://t.co/J47fplWRu5 https://t.co/crOnPGXEda
@AlBowers1 @DMushtuk @holisticgrenade Read. Why AIDs deniers exist. NIH Research NIH website learn about HIV/AIDs Virus studies https://t.co/J47fplWRu5
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @scruboakriver: @covidsafenetwrk Oh yeah, there were people with HIV that denied it. This is a crazy article I wish I had read at the b…
RT @scruboakriver: @covidsafenetwrk Oh yeah, there were people with HIV that denied it. This is a crazy article I wish I had read at the b…
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
RT @covidsafenetwrk: Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
Read this paper. COVID denialism follows the same patterns as HIV/AIDS denialism.
@covidsafenetwrk Oh yeah, there were people with HIV that denied it. This is a crazy article I wish I had read at the beginning of c19 https://t.co/Xq0umBeC4W
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
@lauraespinalmd @drfhowley Él lo dijo por mi.
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @parabasis: Another way Shakespeare truthers mimic anti-vaxxers, global warming skeptics, etc.
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @BVivian14: 💯 The same tactic behind so many claims that college students/faculty no longer consider “diverse viewpoints.”
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
💯 The same tactic behind so many claims that college students/faculty no longer consider “diverse viewpoints.”
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
Scientists debate internally via peer review, revisions, retractions, and more. We do it all the time. The above stalking an ancient tactic to imply debate exists where there is none. https://t.co/vwMzLgVZnn
This is why there is not point in "debating" these folks, or even acknowledging them. Their goal is not to "win" a debate, it's to be included, which legitimizes their bullshit
Science denialists have always been fine with getting thousands of people killed (especially if they're queer)
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…
RT @RottenInDenmark: Constantly referring to a "debate" over settled scientific issues is a deliberate tactic. https://t.co/Ks0ztYtsik ht…