Title |
Bacterial endophthalmitis caused by an intraocular cilium in a patient under treatment with infliximab
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1869-5760-3-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xue-hai Jin, Kenichi Namba, Wataru Saito, Daiju Iwata, Susumu Ishida |
Abstract |
We report a case of bacterial endophthalmitis caused by an intraocular cilium in a patient without any history of trauma or ocular surgery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 81% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,368
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#135
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,538
of 197,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them