↓ Skip to main content

Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes

Overview of attention for article published in Science & Engineering Ethics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes
Published in
Science & Engineering Ethics, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Wynne

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 37%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,840,378
of 13,025,640 outputs
Outputs from Science & Engineering Ethics
#294
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,132
of 368,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Engineering Ethics
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,025,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.