| Title |
Understanding urine output in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-1-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthieu Legrand, Didier Payen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 15% |
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 62 | 23% |
| Unknown | 38 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,255,173
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#143
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,990
of 124,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.