↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the regional climate response in Australia to large-scale climate modes in the historical NARCliM simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the regional climate response in Australia to large-scale climate modes in the historical NARCliM simulations
Published in
Climate Dynamics, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3484-x
Authors

L. Fita, J. P. Evans, D. Argüeso, A. King, Y. Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Unspecified 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 31%
Environmental Science 3 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 23%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#10,833,025
of 12,220,104 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,059
of 2,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,377
of 330,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#69
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.