↓ Skip to main content

The Fellowship Council: a decade of impact on surgical training

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The Fellowship Council: a decade of impact on surgical training
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3007-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis L. Fowler, Nancy J. Hogle

Abstract

The objective of this project is to document the history of the Fellowship Council (FC) and report its current impact on surgical training. The need for advanced training in laparoscopic surgery resulted in the rapid development of fellowships for which there was no oversight. Fellowship program directors began meeting in the 1990s and formally created the FC in 2004 to provide that oversight.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Unspecified 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,641,649
of 12,229,156 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,212
of 3,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,953
of 143,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#82
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,229,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.