↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis
Published in
Neuroradiology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00234-011-0963-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Berg, Gesche Neckelmann, Øivind Gjertsen, Christian Hellum, Lars G. Johnsen, Geir E. Eide, Ansgar Espeland

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 34%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Unspecified 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,774,762
of 8,822,256 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#176
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,062
of 301,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,822,256 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.