| Title |
How Large are Earnings Penalties for Self-Employed and Informal Wage Workers?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IZA Journal of Labor & Development , December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40175-016-0066-6 |
| Authors |
T. H. Gindling, Nadwa Mossaad, David Newhouse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| India | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,671,930
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor & Development
#14
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,997
of 424,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor & Development
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.