↓ Skip to main content

Upper tails for arithmetic progressions in random subsets

Overview of attention for article published in Israel Journal of Mathematics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Upper tails for arithmetic progressions in random subsets
Published in
Israel Journal of Mathematics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11856-017-1546-3
Authors

Lutz Warnke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,416,191
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Israel Journal of Mathematics
#239
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,132
of 312,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Israel Journal of Mathematics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them