Dessutom, vill man attackera evolutionsteori finns det intressanta debatter att förkovra sig i, läs t ex den här av Welch https://t.co/MYnhjJYxsZ eller den här om mysteriet om fåglars evolution jag skrev om på @natursidan för ett tag sedan: https://t.co/UE
@IslaamWins @bertironmonger Exactly. Also here's some scientific atheistic criticism of evolution for Berti: https://t.co/YTJHWnmsGU https://t.co/Ga3BQDGGDm
@WKCosmo What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? Dr John Welch-Cambridge https://t.co/K6mQode08w
Very nice book chapter on evolutionary biology and it’s criticism, by my friend John Welsh. https://t.co/mf5EKBHrfw @BrunaLab @SimonLLewis @lu_falves @NeilBurgess081
@bobsopinions @waiting4evidnce @AiG Don't be so disingenuous about the problems that can and have been posed about evolution...hardly rises to the level of unarguable fact, just one of many articles out there. https://t.co/4pnYvqoKl0
@hojadi @Ah_Science @spikeinthemidge @DoubleDumas @umfpt @dirk_fasshauer @TakeThatDarwin @DiscoveryCSC @hessenjunge76 Cite 1 falsifiable hypothesis that’s been, blah,blah… Clearly nothing is forthcoming from you or your associates at DI, so allow me to of
@JordanHardwic10 @Gutsick_Gibbon What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? 20 December 2016 https://t.co/XKCkhU8w0H https://t.co/kMRyblzGUM
@DrTalebJawad هذا المقال التطوري أكثر تسامحا منك أخي الحبيب … https://t.co/mku6v8eTxX
@ASDKitten But I encourage you to spend time actually looking at the massive body of complaints about evolutionary biology in the literature You can start from this defence of it & if you're particularly versed in genetics 'adaptive function' is a goo
@Call_Me_Emo1 @paulmcmahon85 Then explain these: https://t.co/1svqZD1hep https://t.co/bLwBhgerfd
@Prophecy_YEC @locke_sheldon @yakityxax @AiG You should probably read this. I know you’ll want to get a balanced view of the meeting, seeing as you have the word ‘science’ in your handle and everything. https://t.co/FxJwfqlg29
@Tekla_alkeT @SifuEdition @politicsRbroke @flashgo21 @StephFeminist @LeahNTorres You cannot compare physics, which is predictable and repeatable, to the unverifiable, indirect evidence, which is nothing more than correlation, of biological evolution. Fal
@politicsRbroke @Tekla_alkeT @flashgo21 @StephFeminist @LeahNTorres You're the one who claimed prediction is not required, yet it is one of the main scholarly criticism of the theory. How is it you think you're qualified to grasp the methodology requiremen
@Tekla_alkeT @politicsRbroke @flashgo21 @StephFeminist @LeahNTorres And they're, generally speaking, doing so with poor methodology. This scholarly criticism of the theory echoes my assertions, and then some. The problem with being uneducated in science ph
@yoginho Welch, in an article full of anachronisms (https://t.co/YiXBZtRffT), argues that "something about evolutionary biology makes it prone to the championing of ideas that are new but false or unimportant, or true and important, but already well studie
What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/wj0oR6OwD5
What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? There have been periodic claims that evolutionary biology needs urgent reform. Irrespective of the content... https://t.co/25jmyO9vnX
@Shivangi_g This is worth reading in this respect: https://t.co/FQ27ojdPqy
What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/PFcft8irbc
@mehrwundern @ChristianHachm @HansZauner …und das zu reflektieren stets dazugehört. Bspw. https://t.co/9SEQSARIEP oder https://t.co/1R8RpCFden
"What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?" https://t.co/gcXKIvUMdA
Is there a problem with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/jrKJY60bpp
@DrXaverius Al hilo de esta conversación, hoy me he topado con esto. 2016: los que decimos q hay problemas somos un estorbo https://t.co/KS6nQqCY0p
RT @DrXaverius: Lectura recomendada sobre por qué puedes tener intensitos permanentes pidiendo cambiar la biología evolutiva sin que sea ne…
RT @DrXaverius: Lectura recomendada sobre por qué puedes tener intensitos permanentes pidiendo cambiar la biología evolutiva sin que sea ne…
good read https://t.co/POiKQfDDkq
RT @howbrainsevolve: "calls to reform evolutionary biology actively hinder progress in the field" https://t.co/LjjadEzpc0
RT @howbrainsevolve: "calls to reform evolutionary biology actively hinder progress in the field" https://t.co/LjjadEzpc0
"calls to reform evolutionary biology actively hinder progress in the field" https://t.co/LjjadEzpc0
@SteveStuWill yes, just like red things are https://t.co/CjrXFTcZgX
RT @StuWest8: Red Things are an important and neglected factor in evolution (p4). Genius. https://t.co/aEtICN9s6Z
ICYMI: very interesting paper on criticisms of evo bio. Discussion of adaptive function important for evo psych too https://t.co/a1d7Zu9Zgr
I'm looking forward to reading this, especially given @tvolmag coverage of @EES_update https://t.co/ehhbsrswiG
Red Things are an important and neglected factor in evolution (p4). Genius. https://t.co/aEtICN9s6Z
RT @N_NewtonFisher: Many objections boil down to instinctive dislike of biology being 'fuzzy' &/or a desire for 'a purpose' https://t.co/k3…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
Great contribution by John Welch on the many ways evolutionary biology has been criticized. For good & bad reasons. https://t.co/78AfQzDyd4
RT @lutzfromhage: Nice piece about why evolutionary biology keeps attracting questionable challenges. https://t.co/VU1cKynrxy
Nice piece about why evolutionary biology keeps attracting questionable challenges. https://t.co/VU1cKynrxy
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
Happy or unhappy with the status quo in evolutionary theory? Read this. https://t.co/PKzZdAhbel
RT @b_longdon: Great piece by John Welch on current extended synthesis waffle (including an infamous quote!) https://t.co/QBOeVKWyh5 https:…
3/#365papers: What's wrong with evolutionary biology https://t.co/AVE4jxG3mO
Great piece by John Welch on current extended synthesis waffle (including an infamous quote!) https://t.co/QBOeVKWyh5 https://t.co/u7CHAMcxG6
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @RELenski: Interesting take on "What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?" by John J. Welch, OA in Biology & Philosophy https://t.co/E75ms…
some reading to do #springerlink https://t.co/mjEER5dKvs
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
@nccomfort @David_Dobbs @EcoDevoEvo I suspect a lot of the points raise here: https://t.co/Wa7tuZxZBi apply. Discontent and laundry lists
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @tscottphillips: Well this looks very promising: "What's wrong with evolutionary biology?". Will have to read soon. https://t.co/WVym3Ph…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @RELenski: Interesting take on "What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?" by John J. Welch, OA in Biology & Philosophy https://t.co/E75ms…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @johnhawks: "A dispiriting thing in evolutionary biology is the steady stream of claims that the field needs urgent reform" https://t.co…
To many syntheses? https://t.co/jFYCsDZ6Dp
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @cshperspectives: "much of the funding for challenging current practice in evolutionary biology comes from The John Templeton Foundation…
RT @cshperspectives: "much of the funding for challenging current practice in evolutionary biology comes from The John Templeton Foundation…
RT @cshperspectives: "much of the funding for challenging current practice in evolutionary biology comes from The John Templeton Foundation…
RT @cshperspectives: "much of the funding for challenging current practice in evolutionary biology comes from The John Templeton Foundation…
"much of the funding for challenging current practice in evolutionary biology comes from The John Templeton Foundation" https://t.co/TgjoDVvF5c
RT @RELenski: Interesting take on "What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?" by John J. Welch, OA in Biology & Philosophy https://t.co/E75ms…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/m4ldmKBxSA
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
I'm reading this, 'What’s wrong with evolutionary biology?' on #springerlink https://t.co/18aYzvgrkH
RT @Ryan__Schacht: Big problem for science - ideas rightly rejected in one area can be rediscovered in others https://t.co/6d3MJ9tbue
RT @tscottphillips: The verdict is in: an excellent article. Should be required reading for anybody thinking about evolutionary theory. htt…
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @tscottphillips: The verdict is in: an excellent article. Should be required reading for anybody thinking about evolutionary theory. htt…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
RT @tscottphillips: The verdict is in: an excellent article. Should be required reading for anybody thinking about evolutionary theory. htt…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
re "exceptions to…generalizations" see 3 Past to Future Pattern Types Newton vs Darwin vs Berlin https://t.co/CooMxKMzDj ht @hamandcheese https://t.co/GVzRy7JEGR
RT @SteveStuWill: What's wrong with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/cYPl5UKhSW https://t.co/mBiEOFt6bt
RT @SteveStuWill: What's wrong with evolutionary biology? https://t.co/cYPl5UKhSW https://t.co/mBiEOFt6bt
RT @tscottphillips: The verdict is in: an excellent article. Should be required reading for anybody thinking about evolutionary theory. htt…
The verdict is in: an excellent article. Should be required reading for anybody thinking about evolutionary theory. https://t.co/WVym3Ph67O
RT @kokkonutter: Got distracted (between projects) reading this on a train, but it was a good distraction: what's wrong with evobio? https:…
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…
Can overabundant criticism of evolutionary biology be attributed to "dislike" of behavioral ecology by philosophers and geneticists? https://t.co/dhY0YdAX2k
RT @aylwyn_scally: Thoughtful article by my colleague John Welch on why constant calls for 'new evolutionary synthesis' are harmful. https…