↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation inLycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics & Evolution, January 1977
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Genetic variation inLycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems
Published in
Plant Systematics & Evolution, January 1977
DOI 10.1007/bf00984147
Authors

Charles M. Rick, Jon F. Fobes, Miguel Holle

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 89%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#3,779,336
of 12,873,930 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics & Evolution
#60
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,217
of 368,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics & Evolution
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,873,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.