↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation inLycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, June 1977
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Genetic variation inLycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, June 1977
DOI 10.1007/bf00984147
Authors

Charles M. Rick, Jon F. Fobes, Miguel Holle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 34%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#168
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,253
of 5,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them