Title |
Measuring Subjective Social Status: A Case Study of Older Taiwanese
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, November 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10823-006-9020-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noreen Goldman, Jennifer C. Cornman, Ming-Cheng Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 29% |
Psychology | 6 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#55
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,848
of 68,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.