↓ Skip to main content

Peak Bone Mass

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
994 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
Title
Peak Bone Mass
Published in
Osteoporosis International, December 2000
DOI 10.1007/s001980070020
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. P. Heaney, S. Abrams, B. Dawson-Hughes, A. Looker, A. Looker, R. Marcus, V. Matkovic, C. Weaver

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 482 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 15%
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 52 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 93 19%
Unknown 103 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 33%
Sports and Recreations 40 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 6%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 121 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,511
of 3,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,158
of 114,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.