↓ Skip to main content

The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Nityananda, Ghaith Tarawneh, Steven Errington, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza, Jenny Read

Abstract

The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 26%
Psychology 5 15%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Engineering 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,497,518
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#971
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,850
of 433,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.