↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiologic study of tumors in dinosaurs

Overview of attention for article published in Naturwissenschaften, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,508)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiologic study of tumors in dinosaurs
Published in
Naturwissenschaften, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00114-003-0473-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. M. Rothschild, D. H. Tanke, M. Helbling, L. D. Martin

Abstract

Occasional reports in isolated fragments of dinosaur bones have suggested that tumors might represent a population phenomenon. Previous study of humans has demonstrated that vertebral radiology is a powerful diagnostic tool for population screening. The epidemiology of tumors in dinosaurs was here investigated by fluoroscopically screening dinosaur vertebrae for evidence of tumors. Computerized tomography (CT) and cross-sections were obtained where appropriate. Among more than 10,000 specimens x-rayed, tumors were only found in Cretaceous hadrosaurs (duck-billed dinosaurs). These included hemangiomas and metastatic cancer (previously identified in dinosaurs), desmoplastic fibroma, and osteoblastoma. The epidemiology of tumors in dinosaurs seems to reflect a familial pattern. A genetic propensity or environmental mutagens are suspected.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 114 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 29%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 12 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#50,619
of 13,989,129 outputs
Outputs from Naturwissenschaften
#9
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#461
of 152,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naturwissenschaften
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,989,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.