↓ Skip to main content

An investigation into the remote triggering of the Oita earthquake by the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake using full wavefield simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
An investigation into the remote triggering of the Oita earthquake by the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake using full wavefield simulation
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0585-z
Authors

Masatoshi Miyazawa, Masatoshi Miyazawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 62%
Engineering 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,705,776
of 8,800,428 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#152
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,263
of 300,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,800,428 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.