↓ Skip to main content

Adenine versus guanine quartets in aqueous solution: dispersion-corrected DFT study on the differences in π-stacking and hydrogen-bonding behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, & Modeling, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Adenine versus guanine quartets in aqueous solution: dispersion-corrected DFT study on the differences in π-stacking and hydrogen-bonding behavior
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, & Modeling, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00214-009-0634-9
Authors

Célia Fonseca Guerra, Tushar van der Wijst, Jordi Poater, Marcel Swart, F. Matthias Bickelhaupt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 37 77%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2013.
All research outputs
#9,770,906
of 12,227,948 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, & Modeling
#246
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,604
of 140,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, & Modeling
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,227,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.