↓ Skip to main content

Critical evaluation of toxic versus beneficial effects of methylglyoxal

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry (00062979), November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Critical evaluation of toxic versus beneficial effects of methylglyoxal
Published in
Biochemistry (00062979), November 2009
DOI 10.1134/s0006297909100010
Authors

D. Talukdar, B. S. Chaudhuri, M. Ray, S. Ray

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Chemistry 6 8%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#9,840,704
of 12,322,056 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry (00062979)
#17,819
of 19,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,839
of 338,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry (00062979)
#62
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,322,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.