↓ Skip to main content

Censusing primate populations in the reserved area of the Pacaya and Samiria Rivers, Department Loreto, Peru

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 1976
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Censusing primate populations in the reserved area of the Pacaya and Samiria Rivers, Department Loreto, Peru
Published in
Primates, April 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf02382849
Authors

Melvin Neville, Napoleón Castro, Andrés Mármol, Juan Revilla

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 47%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1981.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,120
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them