↓ Skip to main content

Censusing primate populations in the reserved area of the Pacaya and Samiria Rivers, Department Loreto, Peru

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Censusing primate populations in the reserved area of the Pacaya and Samiria Rivers, Department Loreto, Peru
Published in
Primates, April 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf02382849
Authors

Melvin Neville, Napoleón Castro, Andrés Mármol, Juan Revilla

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 67%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1981.
All research outputs
#3,635,174
of 12,514,593 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#210
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,006
of 365,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,514,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.