Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias | SpringerLink https://t.co/yowpRhYn7a
@Feiryred @benevans_ATAC @BillCashMP scientists are not immune to confirmation bias. Sources should not simply be dismissed - the claims can be analysed and refuted or accepted. https://t.co/Lv8Iak7pE7
@hdur Por estudios como este https://t.co/ejLbhqQM8K
Time to (re)read Feyerabend & Lakatos? https://t.co/ZGaWSlIfB8
RT @briandavidearp: Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGs…
trololololololol https://t.co/uwyslJ6O2c
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @briandavidearp: Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGs…
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @briandavidearp: Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGs…
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @DecideOrSlide: The biggest (undeclared) conflict of interest scientists have is to their ideas. Science only survives at all because of…
RT @DecideOrSlide: I had a class as an undergrad from a couple of experts in this (1978). They knew then that scientists were worse on conf…
RT @briandavidearp: Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGs…
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @pitiklinov: Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
Un clásico: pastores protestantes tienen menos sesgo de confirmación que una muestra de científicos https://t.co/Zei2ipx85O
RT @briandavidearp: Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGs…
I guess scientists are more confident of their points of view and therefore more biased? https://t.co/0GaZSRQm5d
BTW. Those experts were Ryan Tweeney and Michael Doherty. #BGSU Best class I ever had. Ever. And I've had a lot of classes. https://t.co/R75xBK7i2h
The biggest (undeclared) conflict of interest scientists have is to their ideas. Science only survives at all because of competition. https://t.co/R75xBK7i2h
I had a class as an undergrad from a couple of experts in this (1978). They knew then that scientists were worse on conf bias than ave peeps https://t.co/R75xBK7i2h
Interesting. https://t.co/k5cZH69BMi
Relatively uneducated protestant ministers less prone to confirmation bias than sample of scientists https://t.co/iDuGsnbXM9 https://t.co/bESL6faLEs
@trumwill the famous one: https://t.co/E7KvyfPJxt